generating precise understanding crowdsourcing accurate wisdom generating contingent predictions delivering critical estimations exploring intelligent contingencies predicting precise understanding formulating accurate understanding formulating definitive contingencies formulating accurate estimations formulating quantitative forecasts mapping the future generating accurate understanding aggregating contingent understanding computing accurate contingencies predicting critical estimations exploring precise forecasts generating intelligent insights mapping contingent understanding formulating intelligent forecasts generating definitive forecasts aggregating probable contingencies calculating precise wisdom mapping calibrated estimations calculating predictive contingencies composing precise estimations forecasting predictive wisdom generating accurate wisdom modeling critical estimations


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will humanity maintain a continuous off-Earth presence until 2050?

Since October 31 2000, the date Soyuz TM-31 lifted off from the Baikonur Cosmodrome carrying the members of Expedition 1, the first long-duration ISS crew, humanity has maintained a permanent off-Earth presence for more than 19 years.

This question asks: Will humanity maintain an off-Earth presence continuously until 1 January 2050?

For a positive resolution, at least one living and conscious biological human must be physically located at some point beyond 100km altitude above Earth's mean sea level at all times continuously until 1 January 2050. This could include persons aboard spacecraft and space stations, as well as persons on any astronomical object other than Earth (e.g. Moon or Mars explorers / settlers).

If the number of living and conscious biological humans off-Earth drops to zero at any time before 1 January 2050, this question resolves negatively. EMs, artificial intelligence systems, humans in suspended animation or cryopreservation, and all other instances of either wholly non-biological or non-conscious humans will not count for the purposes of this question. Humans who are merely sleeping will be considered conscious for the purposes of this question.

However, biological humans with some degree of cybernetic augmentation (brain implants, artificial limbs or organs, etc) will suffice, so long as they could still reproduce with un-augmented humans.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.