# Metaculus

## Question

### Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

# Comparing 538 and Economist forecasts in 2020

There are many groups forecasting the 2020 Presidential Election using (primarily) polls based models. FiveThirtyEight run by Nate Silver and The Economist run by G Elliott Morris.

Both FiveThirtyEight and The Economist have published probabilities for each state in the 2020 Presidential Election.

Which forecasts will prove to be more accurate?

*Will 538 outperform The Economist forecasting the 2020 Presidential Election?*

To compare, we will score each set of predictions using a Brier score averaged over all N=51 races, computed as

where enumerates the possible outcomes (i.e. possible winners) in the th race out of N, where is the forecast probability of candidate winning the th race, and is assigned 1 if candidate wins the th race, and 0 otherwise.

For example, if The Economist assigned 52% to Trump and 48% to Biden in Texas and if Trump won then The Economist would achieve a Brier Score of

A lower Brier score is better, with perfect predictions corresponding to S=0.

This question resolves positively if the Brier score for the 51 races is lower for 538's probabilities than for The Economist's probabilities. We will download each model's "model outputs" from their respective websites at 1400 UTC 02-Nov-2020

To obtain the 538 probabilities we will download the CSV from here and take the winstate_inc for Republicans and winstate_chal for Democrats in each state. (Ignoring congressional district specific probabilities)

To obtain The Economist's probabilities we will download the model outputs zip here, and use the values from the state_averages_and_predictions_topline.csv file

### {{qctrl.predictionString()}}

### Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into *current points* and *total points*. Current points show how much your prediction is worth *now*, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

#### Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded *anonymously*.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

##### Track your predictions

##### Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

### Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.