formulating definitive estimations exploring definitive insights assembling contingent insights generating contingent predictions generating definitive understanding mapping the future predicting quantitative wisdom mapping probable forecasts forecasting quantitative predictions composing predictive futures delivering predictive insights calculating precise contingencies formulating definitive contingencies calculating intelligent estimations

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will Donald Trump submit to questioning as part of Mueller's investigation?

As Mueller's investigation into Russia's role in the 2016 election continues, discussion has begun as to whether Trump himself will testify under oath.

President Donald Trump declared on Wednesday 1/24/2018 that he’s “looking forward” to being questioned — under oath — in the special counsel’s probe of Russian election interference and possible Trump obstruction in the firing of the FBI director. Trump said he would be willing to answer questions under oath in the interview, which special counsel Robert Mueller has been seeking but which White house officials had not previously said the president would grant. “I’m looking forward to it, actually,” Trump said when asked by reporters at the White House. As for timing, he said, “I guess they’re talking about two or three weeks, but I’d love to do it.”

White House council has, reportedly, been looking to constrain and/or manage the terms of the any such interview.

Will Trump in fact submit to an interview by Independence Day 7/4/2018?

Resolution is positive if by July 4 Trump testifies under questioning by Mueller or one of his team, in connection with the ongoing investigation. The interview need not be broadcast or publicly accessible, but it should be in-person (not for example written responses to questions) and interrogatory (i.e. not a single statement made verbally under oath, nor just answers with no followups to questions that are known to Trump+team in advance.)

Resolution will be negative if Trump testifies before a grand jury before being interviewed by one Mueller's team.

(Edit Feb 4, 2018: Specified resolution criteria in the case of Trump testifying before a grand jury.)

(Edit Feb 9, 2018: Removed "under oath")

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.