delivering quantitative understanding assembling quantitative forecasts computing intelligent contingencies modeling calibrated contingencies crowdsourcing critical wisdom mapping the future aggregating accurate estimations crowdsourcing quantitative futures generating precise predictions calculating intelligent insights composing calibrated predictions formulating contingent forecasts generating predictive contingencies aggregating predictive contingencies

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

When will Leela Zero or some other self-learning chess engine win the world computer chess title?

Last December, the chess world was shocked when Google announced that a home-grown chess program, Alpha Zero, crushed the world's previously most dominant chess engine, Stockfish, in controlled conditions.

What was especially cool was that Alpha Zero taught itself to play chess at this ridiculously competitive level without referencing any books or human strategy. It just played itself millions of times and learned from its experiences.

Google vanished Alpha Zero, but chess programming boffins recently created a similar open-source program called Leela--which learns and improves in a similar fashion. Chess commentators have compared her to "Alpha Zero's little sister". Within a few weeks, she managed to surge from a rating of around 1800 (a strong club player) to a strength so impressive that she nearly knocked out Grandmaster Andrew Tang in a match.

As of this writing, though, Leela still struggles against the silicon best and brightest--in April, she finished near the bottom of the field in a match against other engines.

When will Leela--or some other self-learning chess engine, along the lines of Alpha Zero--claim the crown and win the official Top Computer Engine Championship (TCEC)?

For positive resolution, the winning program should be trained almost entirely via self-play. That is, the system in start of training should be below ELO 1000. Resolution defaults to "never" if this does not occur by June 1, 2022. (One can imagine this happening if, for example, the top competitors are systems with enough built-in structure to be decent > 1000 ELO players before they start any self-play.)

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.