crowdsourcing definitive wisdom generating critical contingencies formulating critical understanding modeling definitive futures exploring definitive estimations mapping the future formulating calibrated wisdom aggregating accurate futures aggregating quantitative forecasts delivering critical wisdom modeling critical forecasts computing intelligent predictions delivering quantitative contingencies calculating quantitative futures


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Who will win the Royal Society Insight Investment Science Book Prize?

On August 2nd, 2018, the shortlist for the Royal Society Insight Investment Science Book Prize was released. The winner will be announced at an award ceremony on October 1st and receive £25,000.

The shortlisted works are all over the scientific spectrum from the the interaction of humanity and machines to the strange behaviours present in the animal kingdom. Of the six nominees, Mark Miodownik is the only one to have been previously nominated. He won the 2014 prize for his book Stuff Matters.

The books are as follows:

  1. Inventing Ourselves: The Secret Life of the Teenage Brain by Sarah-Jayne Blakemore

  2. The Unexpected Truth About Animals by Lucy Cooke

  3. The Beautiful Cure: Harnessing Your Body’s Natural Defences by Daniel M Davis

  4. Hello World: How to be Human in the Age of the Machine by Hannah Fry

  5. Liquid: The Delightful and Dangerous Substances That Flow Through Our Lives by Mark Miodownik

  6. Exactly: How Precision Engineers Created the Modern World by Simon Winchester

Since Metaculus, at present, is not set up for non-binary categorical questions, we will instead somewhat artificially recast this as as binary question:

Will a woman win the 2018 Royal Society Insight Investment Science Book Prize?

Of the six nominees, three are women (Sarah-Jayne Blakemore, Lucy Cooke, and Hannah Fry) and three are men (Daniel M Davis, Mark Miodownik, and Simon Winchester). The resolution will be determined by a press release by the Royal Society or a post on its website declaring the winner.

Users are encouraged to discuss individual books and their win probabilities in the comments.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.

Embed this question

You can use the below code snippet to embed this question on your own webpage. Feel free to change the height and width to suit your needs.