modeling definitive predictions crowdsourcing intelligent estimations modeling calibrated predictions calculating accurate futures mapping intelligent wisdom mapping the future forecasting precise forecasts aggregating accurate predictions composing contingent futures predicting quantitative futures aggregating contingent estimations modeling intelligent contingencies generating quantitative insights forecasting contingent predictions


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will the (theoretical) existence of "dark matter hair" change the way we look for dark matter?

Mid 2015, a paper by Gary Prezéau of NASA Jet Propulsion Lab was submitted to ApJ exploring the theoretical dynamics of fine-grained dark matter filaments, streams of dark matter particles, that may be emanating out of the Earth and other bodies in our solar system.

So called dark matter "hairs," these would constitute a new prediction of the Big Bang standard model of cosmology, CDM. Dark matter halos are known to collect themselves into cosmic scale filaments, but if the dark matter is sufficiently cold, smaller filaments can also exist on scales comparable to our solar system. Prezéau predicts that if one of these fine-grain streams passes through a planet, gravity squeezes the streams into dense regions (hairs), which exhibit points of critical density (roots) at specified distances away from the center of the planet in question.

In the case of Earth, these roots would be located around km away from the planetary center, a bit more than twice the distance to the Moon. They would be high-density hot spots for us to look for dark matter particles. If Prezéau's findings are substantially valid, they provide a potential channel of discovery for detecting dark matter. Will dark matter hairs receive scientific support over the next year?

This question resolves positively if by June 2017, Prezéau's paper Dense Dark Matter Hairs Spreading Out from Earth, Jupiter and Other Compact Bodies is cited more than 5 times on Google scholar by papers which mention dark matter hairs as a supporting directive in the abstract.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.