delivering quantitative forecasts aggregating quantitative insights crowdsourcing critical forecasts composing quantitative wisdom mapping definitive insights mapping the future aggregating intelligent futures modeling accurate insights assembling intelligent understanding predicting critical estimations generating intelligent forecasts calculating predictive insights predicting probable insights formulating accurate predictions


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will rapid rocket reusability be demonstrated by 2021?

SpaceX Founder and CEO Elon Musk believes that a fully and rapidly reusable rocket is the pivotal breakthrough needed to substantially reduce the cost of space access.

SpaceX has had some significant successes in pursuit of this goal, but as of December 2018 has not yet demonstrated that it is possible to launch a payload to orbit, land a complete rocket or rocket stage and re-fly that asset within 24 hours, which Musk in 2018 claimed is a key milestone for rapid reusability. According to Elon Musk:

Our goal, just to give you a sense of how reusable we think the design can be, we intend to demonstrate two orbital launches of the same Block 5 vehicle within 24 hours, no later than next year.

Toward the end of next year we'll see the first Block 5 seeing [its] 10th flight. And like I said, next year is when we intend to demonstrate re-flight of the same primary rocket booster within — basically, same day re-flight of the same rocket. I think that's really a key milestone.

This question asks: before 1 January 2021, will any rocket stage or complete rocket be used to successfully complete its role in delivering any payload to orbit or an Earth-escape trajectory, land successfully on Earth (whether on land or at sea) and then re-flown on another orbital or Earth-escape mission, with the second liftoff taking place within 24 hours of liftoff of the first mission, and with the rocket or rocket stage landing successfully a second time?

Note that the vehicle in question need not be owned or operated by SpaceX - any qualifying instance of these events will result in a positive resolution.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.