Metaculus Help: Spread the word
If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.
Will the identity of the author of anonymous NYT editorial become known in 2019?
The identity of the author of the anonymous NYT op-ed published on Sept. 5, 2018, criticizing the Trump administration, is still unknown. Despite much speculation, all efforts at figuring out who wrote it have not been successful in 2018. The question is:
Will the identity of the author be revealed in 2019?
Resolution is positive if a reliable media report indicates with very high probability the author of the editorial, which can be based either on journalistic research, confession of the author, administrative action (such as firing an individual due to the authoring of the editorial), or another action identifying the author with high degree of certainty. Conjectures and publishing circumstantial evidence which could be pointing to possible authorship but not definitely resolving the question do not qualify as resolution.
Metaculus help: Predicting
Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.
The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.
The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.
This question is not yet open for predictions.
Metaculus help: Community Stats
Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.
When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.