forecasting critical understanding formulating predictive predictions delivering critical wisdom delivering accurate understanding aggregating critical estimations mapping the future delivering predictive understanding modeling contingent understanding exploring probable futures delivering calibrated futures delivering quantitative understanding generating precise forecasts modeling definitive predictions forecasting calibrated futures


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

World population forecast to peak before 2100?

In most developed countries the birth rate is below the natural replacement rate of about 2.1 births per female. The past few decades have seen a pattern where developing countries undergo a demographic transition as they develop, giving lower birth rates and longer lifespans at the same time as economic developments.

World population forecasts which include economic development and demographic transition then predict an eventual peak to the world's population.

The most prominent world population forecast is produced every two years by the United Nations. In their latest version from 2015 the world population is, in the most likely scenario, projected to continue growing thru 2100.

On the other hand, the 2014 population projection from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis attempts a more refined analysis of the role of female education in demographic transition and forecasts a population peak before 2100.

Neither the UN nor IIASA approaches takes into account growth-limiting factors like food availability, disease, or climate change.

Since it is a long time to wait to find out when the population peak will occur, for this question we will focus only on the most prominent UN projection.

Will the 2017 revision of the UN World Population Prospects project a population peak by 2100 in its most likely scenario?

Resolution is positive if the 2017 update shows a "median" in the probabilistic projections (see this link but select WORLD from the menu) with a population maximum earlier than 2100.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.