generating predictive understanding formulating calibrated insights composing calibrated estimations mapping calibrated futures delivering probable contingencies mapping the future forecasting contingent contingencies composing calibrated futures formulating accurate wisdom exploring accurate wisdom modeling probable wisdom aggregating contingent insights computing predictive insights calculating quantitative estimations

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will Planet Nine Emerge from Hiding Soon?

Few science stories rise to the occasion of occasioning push notifications from both the New York Times and NPR. Planet Nine was among a handful of recent examples.

In mid-January of 2016, two Caltech Professors -- Konstantin Batygin and Mike Brown -- kicked the news media into high gear by predicting the existence of a new, but as-yet unseen, planet in the outer solar system. They asserted that Neptune et al.'s erstwhile sibling has an orbital period of about 20,000 years, and a super-Earth mass more than sufficient to bring the planet count back up to nine.

Batygin and Brown's paper, despite containing a bracing dose of secular perturbation theory, has been downloaded over 300,000 times, and presents indirect dynamical evidence for Planet Nine. Its presence is inferred through the gravitational sculpting that it has produced in the trajectories of the most distant Pluto-like worlds that lie beyond Neptune's orbit.

Follow-up papers by (among others) Fienga et al., Holman and Payne and Malhotra et al. have added credibility and detail to the Planet Nine hypothesis.

Based on the host of recent results, Metaculus now calculates a most probable current sky position for Planet Nine of RA=2h, Dec=0 deg. This area of the sky is currently close to optimal visibility for a planet at opposition. At the most probable location, the planet's current distance would be r~600 AU, and the expected V magnitude is 21. A number of groups have engaged in the hunt, and there is something of an emerging consensus that if the planet is to be found, it'll be found sooner rather than later. As an example, Mike Brown gives sixteen months. This second update to our original, now closed, Planet Nine question is thus in order:

Will the discovery by direct observation of a new solar system planet having characteristics substantially similar to those described in the Batygin-Brown paper, be announced in a peer-reviewed paper prior to the Jan. 20, 2017 first anniversary of the Batygin-Brown prediction?

(For this question to resolve as "Yes", the new solar system planet should have an inferred radius larger than that of Earth, an orbital period greater than 5,000 years, and an orbital eccentricity e > 0.25).

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.