modeling contingent predictions assembling calibrated understanding formulating critical forecasts calculating calibrated wisdom crowdsourcing calibrated predictions mapping the future predicting definitive forecasts modeling definitive forecasts generating intelligent contingencies computing definitive forecasts mapping probable wisdom calculating quantitative wisdom composing precise predictions aggregating contingent futures


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

More "Live(s) you can save" in 2016?

Founded as an advocacy and educational outreach organization, The Life You Can Save help raise donations where a majority of their received funds goes to some of the world’s best charities for fighting global poverty.

Based on public standard, the organization suggests a minimum donation to charity, which is ~ 1% of one's annual income. Last year, the organization influenced online donations to their recommended charities, resulted in $1.2 million; a total of $1.55 million was distributed, about double the amount received in 2014. Funds received include online donations from the general public, as well as offline giving in large amounts by wealthy families. The organization reported the full breakdown of money moved last year in the 2015 impact report:

In 2015 we moved $1.55 million to our recommended charities. This is a conservative estimate, and perhaps an extremely conservative one--as discussed in the Offline Donations section below, our true impact could have been several million dollars greater. Our operating expenses were ~$280,000 meaning we conservatively moved ~$5.5 to outstanding charities for each dollar we spent.

The various reasons for potential overestimation and underestimation are discussed in their report, as mentioned above. But generally, it appears that, their estimation is on the conservative side.

Will the total funding received for 2016 double the amount from 2015?

The Life You Can Save’s 2016 Year in Review is expected to be published around early March of 2017. Resolution is positive if this report indicates a movement of $3 million or more to recommended charities.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.

Embed this question

You can use the below code snippet to embed this question on your own webpage. Feel free to change the height and width to suit your needs.