composing calibrated futures computing accurate understanding calculating probable futures generating predictive futures assembling critical predictions mapping the future computing accurate futures calculating critical forecasts modeling definitive understanding assembling contingent predictions delivering quantitative understanding predicting probable understanding exploring intelligent understanding calculating critical estimations

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Vacuum birefringence probably found near neutron stars: more research to come?

Astronomers may have observed vacuum birefringence, a quantum effect predicted by the theory of quantum electrodynamics (QED) in the 1930s, by studying light behavior in the highly magnetized empty space around neutron star RX J1856.5-3754.

Ordinary space is generally thought to be empty with no effect on the path travelled by light, but in the presence of strong magnetic fields, a quantum effect can emerge and modify the space, as in the case of this neutron star's strong magnetic fields that permeate its surroundings.

The team submitted their findings (Mignani et al.) to arXiv in Oct 2016, and published their work in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society in Nov. 2016.

The researchers analyzed data from the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and found the boosting effect of vacuum birefringence realized in the affected propagation of light in the space around the neutron star.

This is the first direct observational evidence supporting vacuum birefringence effects predicted by QED. The next generation of telescopes, including the European Extremely Large Telescope, will likely participate in future observational tests.

As of this writing, the Mignani et al. paper has not yet been cited by any other studies.

Will there be significant followup work referencing this research?

For the purpose of this question, we will assess via the number of citations of Mignani et al. paper. As of writing no referenced has been made yet, and for this question to resolve as positive, there needs to be a minimum of 10 citations, on or before Nov 1, 2017, per Google Scholar.

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.