composing definitive predictions predicting calibrated forecasts aggregating definitive futures delivering quantitative wisdom exploring intelligent estimations mapping the future formulating precise futures calculating probable insights modeling calibrated contingencies delivering precise forecasts formulating predictive wisdom predicting probable forecasts exploring predictive forecasts computing accurate wisdom

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Confirmation that hominids existed in North America prior to 100,000 BC?

A recent stunning and controversial claim by a group led by Tom Deméré, has emerged that a site in California contains fossil mammoth bones dating to ~130,000 BC that appear to have been broken and manipulated by human (or possibly other hominid) tools. This would predate by more than 1000 centuries the current general consensus that humans reached North America only around 25,000 years ago at earliest.

As nicely detailed in this National Geographic piece, other researchers are skeptical of the study, citing the absence of the tools themselves or other corroborating evidence.

So will this evidence for a (much) earlier hominid species in North America turn out to be true? To get at this we'll ask the following:

By start of 2020, will an additional site be discovered in California, dated to prior to 50,000 years ago and indicating Hominid presence, with an analysis published in a peer-reviewed journal that cites this discovery as evidence for the Deméré paper

OR

By start of 2019, will more than two additional and independent (no shared authorship) analyses of the Deméré et al. site's findings, published in peer reviewed journals, argue on the balance in favor of hominid presence prior to 100,000 BC in California.

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.