[Short fuse] Will 538's election forecast rate Trump's chances higher than the forecast from The Economist?

Your submission is now in Draft mode. Once it's ready, please submit your draft for review by our team of Community Moderators. Thank you!


The outcome of the US presidential election is the subject of this Metaculus question, which with over 330 interest votes at the time of question writing is the most "interesting" question on the front page of Metaculus by more than an order of magnitude. There also many related questions, which can be found here.

Several public forecasts for the election already exist, probably the most famous of which is this model by The Economist, which puts Trump's chance of winning significantly lower than the Metaculus community median.

Project 538's own forecast is widely anticipated, but has not yet been released, although an aggregated poll tracker is available. 538's own analysis of how well their model did in the 2018 midterms is available here.

This question asks:

When 538's presidential election forecast is released, will the chance of a Trump victory be higher than that given by the forecast from The Economist at that time?

In the case that multiple forecasts are released by 538, the model considering the most information is chosen for this question. For example, if, like in 2016, there is a "nowcast", a "polls-only forecast", and a "polls-plus forecast", the "polls-plus forecast" would be chosen. In the case that it is not clear for this description which model should be considered, 538's flagship model will be chosen using the algorithm described in a comment by @underyx.

If the models give the same probability when rounded to the nearest %, this question resolves as negative.

If 538 never releases an election forecast, or if The Economist withdraws theirs before 538's model is released, this question resolves ambiguously.

Politics – US

Make a Prediction


Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Current points depend on your prediction, the community's prediction, and the result. Your total earned points are averaged over the lifetime of the question, so predict early to get as many points as possible! See the FAQ.

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site