computing precise insights modeling precise understanding modeling calibrated estimations delivering precise wisdom composing critical estimations mapping the future mapping accurate understanding computing definitive insights mapping critical futures assembling contingent predictions calculating predictive understanding forecasting probable estimations computing intelligent understanding assembling probable forecasts

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

By 2020, will one of the two major U.S. political parties nominate for some office someone who openly admits to being a Flat Earther?

Despite the unbelievable level of evidence available, and the fact that anyone with a well and a stick can prove that the Earth is round, belief in various forms of Flat-Eartherism is on the rise. Newsweek reported in November 2017 that “Starting in mid-2017, a string of news stories propelled the flat-Earth movement’s traffic into the digital stratosphere.”

The Economist concurs: the publication has been charting Google searches for “flat Earth” terms, and it’s found that they’re increasingly popular.

At the same time, prominent U.S. politicians on both sides of the aisle have been accused of embracing fringe ideas.

How long will it take before a nominated Democratic or Republican candidate embraces Flat-Eartherism publicly?

For a positive result, an “out” Flat-Earther must be officially nominated by the Democratic or Republican party for statewide or national office by the end of 2020. (In case of any ambiguity the nominee must appear on the appropriate state's election ballot under one of the two major parties' names, running for a statewide or national office.) The "out" portion will be determined by credible media report that the candidate can be reasonably interpreted as confirming their belief in speech or writing.

(edit 3/5/18 to clarify that the party need only be a candidate, not necessarily elected.)

(edit 7/4/18 to clarify in the 'statewide' case the candidate must be voted by the whole state at once, i.e. state legislators are not included.)

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.