computing definitive wisdom formulating calibrated forecasts forecasting precise understanding computing definitive understanding formulating accurate forecasts mapping the future aggregating predictive predictions forecasting contingent understanding mapping definitive forecasts forecasting precise predictions aggregating definitive contingencies forecasting accurate predictions assembling precise understanding assembling calibrated predictions

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will NASA’s WFIRST still be funded as of the 2018 mid-term elections?

NASA plans to launch its Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST) in the middle of the next decade. Per the agency, the purpose is “to settle essential questions in the areas of dark energy, exoplanets, and infrared astrophysics.” Among other things, the observatory will “have a field of view that is 100 times greater than the Hubble infrared instrument, capturing more of the sky with less observing time… [and] will measure light from a billion galaxies over the course of the mission lifetime… It also has instruments to find and take images of planets around other stars.”

But WFIRST is in trouble.

The Trump administration proposed a budget for Fiscal Year 2019 that would cancel the observatory, which (for technical reasons) would have required an increase in funding.

Prominent science journalist, Ethan Siegel (“Starts with a Bang”) has argued that this move would “permanently ruin NASA.” He writes “If WFIRST gets cancelled, it's a sign that even the most important NASA project, as determined by internal, external, and independent reviewers, is subject to political whims.”

Will WFIRST survive this attack?

For a positive resolution WFIRST must still be funded through 2019 at a level compatible with the mission's continuation, as of the 2018 midterm elections, via whatever budget is in place at that time. Resolution is negative if a budget passes in which WFIRST's 2019 funding is cut by more than 50% from the level requested by NASA as of early 2018 for the mission.

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.