formulating probable forecasts formulating definitive estimations aggregating definitive estimations predicting precise insights crowdsourcing calibrated futures mapping the future formulating predictive futures exploring contingent futures modeling critical predictions exploring predictive contingencies generating critical wisdom predicting predictive estimations aggregating intelligent wisdom mapping calibrated insights

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Any progress in human lifespan enhancement by 2100?

There have been great improvements in medical technology in the last few centuries, which has led to very significant increases in life expectancy. Yet, while medical technology has stopped the vast majority of us dying young, it has not been very effective at increasing the maximum age that humans can live to. Ramesses II lived to the age of 90, even though the life expectancy in ancient Egypt might have been below 30. Similarly, the English aristocracy between 1500-1550 already had a life expectancy of 71, meaning that quite a few of them will have lived into their 80s. The oldest person the world, as of the writing of this question, is aged 117. It is unclear whether anybody in the ancient world lived to a similar age (there were many claims of extreme age and very poor record keeping), but it certainly does not seem completely impossible.

Recently, though, there have been attempts to actually extend he upper limit of human lifespan. The Methuselah Foundation has managed to keep mice alive for the equivalent of 180 human years. Yet, it is unclear whether this achievement will be transferrable to humans.

It is asked:Will there be any progress in human lifespan enhancement by 2100?

This questions resolves positive if:

EITHER

  • There have been at least 10 people who have lived to the age of 130 by 2100.
  • OR

  • There have been at least 100 people who have lived to the age of 120 by 2100.
  • OR

  • Ray Kurzweil lives to the age of 120.
  • The resolution triggering people have to have their age verified by standards at least as strict as the standards used at the time of the writing of this question. People resuscitated after being cryonically frozen do not count.

    Here is some context on verified claims up to the writing of this question:

  • 46 people have reached the age of 115.
  • 19 people have reached the age of 116.
  • 9 people have reached the age of 117.
  • 2 people have lived beyond the age of 117.
  • Only one person is verified to have lived to 120, and they lived to 122.
  • Also note that the people who could trigger positive resolution here are all already alive and at least middle aged as of the writing of this question.

    {{qctrl.predictionString()}}

    Metaculus help: Predicting

    Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

    The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

    The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

    Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

    Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

    This question is not yet open for predictions.

    Thanks for predicting!

    Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

    Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

    Track your predictions
    Continue exploring the site

    Community Stats

    Metaculus help: Community Stats

    Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

    When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.