composing definitive insights composing predictive contingencies mapping calibrated contingencies aggregating probable contingencies composing quantitative futures mapping the future crowdsourcing intelligent futures formulating quantitative insights predicting critical contingencies aggregating probable insights generating quantitative estimations mapping predictive contingencies exploring calibrated estimations mapping definitive contingencies

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will Apple help the FBI access the 'San Bernardino iPhone'?

The past several years have seen escalating tension between tech giants such as Apple and Google, and government agencies including the CIA and FBI, over the encryption of data on devices and over the internet.

In recent weeks this has escalated into a confrontation between the FBI and Apple computer concerning encryption on iPhones. In this case, the FBI wishes for Apple to provide it access to an iPhone owned by Syed Farook, alleged shooter in the San Bernardino shooting event.

On Feb. 16, a judge ordered Apple to assist the FBI in providing access to this device via a “one time” weakening of the security technology, in essence allowing the FBI to much more quickly brute-force the iPhone’s pin.

Apple, via CEO Tim Cook, has protested this, writing in a letter to its customers that this would compromise security of iPhones in general, to which it is strongly committed. On Feb. 18, Google CEO Sundar Pichai expressed support for Apple’s position.

This conflict raises long-term questions about the future of encryption in consumer devices. Here, we address just the short term question:

Will the FBI have access to the information on the iphone in question by March 30, 2016?

Resolution will be positive if credible media reports by March 30, 2016 report that Apple has indeed complied with the order to assist the FBI, and the FBI has indeed accessed the data.

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.