delivering critical futures modeling intelligent insights delivering definitive insights assembling probable futures assembling accurate forecasts mapping the future aggregating probable estimations modeling precise predictions aggregating precise understanding mapping probable predictions generating intelligent estimations computing contingent contingencies generating contingent understanding calculating definitive futures


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

A is in the I of the beholder #1: Wait, is this video for real?

As ever-more sophisticated expert systems, machine learning systems, and other "narrow AI" systems are developed and commercialized, the line between the "natural" and "artificial" is becoming blurred in more and more everyday interactions.

Automated call-processing systems leave (temporary) ambiguity as to whether one is addressing a person or machine. Autonomous vehicles drive relatively unnoticed on the roads. In an amusing twist, Facebook's "M" personal assistant led to an actual investigative report as to whether it was actually an AI or humans masquerading as AI.

In this series of questions we probe some fun, interesting, and disquieting possibilities that may come to pass over the next few years through the blurring of these lines.

We start with video. The ability of generate highly believable CGI has existed for some time, but has generally fallen short of of creating believable humans, with a dangerous "uncanny valley" discouraging many attempts. That is changing, however.

In the movie Terminator 5, a relatively convincing circa-1980's Arnold Schwarzenegger was digitally generated atop a live actor to create scenes in which "young Arnold" fought "old Arnold." (So this was a CGI simulating a human playing a robot pretending to be a human...)

Late last year, a new system was announced that can superimposed both words and facial movements upon a person who never said those words, simulating for example Obama giving Bush's speech or vice-versa.

While photographs have long been realized to be suspect due to photoshopping, the era of spoofed videos is just beginning and probably not widely known.

By late 2017, will there be a wide-scale hoax be created using video-alteration technology to put words in a famous figure's mouth?

For a positive resolution, a video must exist and satisfy the follow criteria by Oct 31, 2017:

  • It is originally posted without any indication of non-authenticity (i.e. it is at least tacitly suggested that the video is of actual events.)

  • It portrays a well-known person doing and/or saying something they did not in reality say or do.

  • The video has had more than 1 million views.

  • The video is referred to in at least one major news outlet as a "hoax."

Selective/misleading editing does not count here, as that is old news (though still can be quite effective!)


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.

Embed this question

You can use the below code snippet to embed this question on your own webpage. Feel free to change the height and width to suit your needs.