composing probable estimations exploring intelligent insights formulating accurate wisdom formulating intelligent contingencies formulating quantitative estimations mapping the future aggregating definitive predictions modeling precise wisdom exploring calibrated wisdom composing probable understanding calculating probable forecasts predicting quantitative wisdom composing accurate estimations crowdsourcing calibrated wisdom


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Pandemic series: efficient human-to-human transmission of H5N1?

It would be pleasant to believe that worldwide epidemics, such as the 1346-53 black death or the 1918-19 Spanish Influenza, are a thing of the past. There is, however, no good reason to believe this is the case. While medical countermeasures and sanitation are dramatically improved, global interconnectivity and human (and livestock) population density are much higher, creating favorable conditions for the emergence of natural pandemics.

Moreover, while national militaries have for some time had the capability of weaponizing pathogens, the advent of effective genetic engineering suggests that this capability — as well as the ability to generate qualitatively new pathogens — may become much more widely available to both nations and terror groups, increasing the risk of bioterror or bioerror incidents.

Perhaps the highest risk for a natural pandemic is posed by new versions of influenza. Per a 2008 paper:

Since 1500, there appear to have been 13 or more influenza pandemics[....]; in the past 120 years there were undoubted pandemics in 1889, 1918, 1957, 1968 and 1977. In 1918, the worst pandemic in recorded history caused approximately 546,000 excess deaths in the United States (675,000 total deaths) and killed up to 50 million people worldwide.

Previous survey indicate that experts assign significant probability to such pandemics recurring. For our first question we focus on this possibility:

Will the CDC, WHO, or a published scientific paper report that H5N1 or a similar influenza virus has become an efficient human-to-human transmitter (capable of being propagated through at least two epidemiological generations of affected humans) by mid-2019?

(Notes: Here, "similar" will be taken to mean an H5N1 strain, or a strain described in the literature as a "variant", "version", etc., of the current H5N1, and in particular be believed to have a similar fatality rate. This question concerns natural mutation/variation and does not concern engineered version of H5N1, which will be considered in separate questions.)


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.

Embed this question

You can use the below code snippet to embed this question on your own webpage. Feel free to change the height and width to suit your needs.