Metaculus Help: Spread the word
If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.
Will Wikileaks release a significant augmentation to the Equation Group cyberespionage archive?
Sometimes, events in real life appear to have been cribbed from the scripts of Hollywood thrillers.
On August 16th, the New York Times, along with a number of other news outlets, reported on the release, by an entity referring to itself as the Shadow Brokers, of a 256 Mb compressed archive containing roughly 4,000 files of various types.
According to this security response post from Symantec, the archive contains installation scripts, configuration files and exploits targeting a range of routers and firewall tools. The leaked files have been linked to a sophisticated actor known as the Equation Group, which itself appears, according to experts, to be associated with the U.S. National Security Agency's highly classified Tailored Access Operations unit.
The files appear to be of considerable significance. Cisco Systems, for example, notes that the leak illuminates a high-severity "zero-day" vulnerability that had gone undetected for years in every supported version of the company's Adaptive Security Appliance firewall.
The released files appear to date from mid-2013, around the time of Edward Snowden's leak of NSA-related documents. In a somewhat cartoonish manner, the Shadow Brokers state in broken english that they are in possession of further files, whose release they claim they will grant to the winner of an apparently purposefully unsophisticated, and as-yet unsuccessful bitcoin auction:
“We hack Equation Group. We find many many Equation Group cyber weapons. You see pictures. We give you some Equation Group files free…But not all, we are auction the best files.”
A series of tweets by Edward Snowden encapsulates the widely held suspicion that the Shadow Brokers are associated with Russian state cyberespionage, and that the timing of the archive leak is related to recent hacks of internal e-mails and other files of the Democratic National Committee.
Wikileaks has entered the story, by stating that they are in possession of the full Equation Group archive, and that they intend to release the files, specifically, "a pristine copy of the files in due course"
Will Wikileaks release a material augmentation to the leaked Equation Group files on or before September 1, 2016? In order to resolve in the positive, the release must be reported in either the New York Times or the Washington Post, and the reporting article(s) must quote experts (either with or without attribution) attesting to the significance of any additional files.
Metaculus help: Predicting
Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.
The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.
The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.
Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.
This question is not yet open for predictions.
Metaculus help: Community Stats
Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.
When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.