exploring intelligent predictions exploring contingent understanding composing precise contingencies delivering critical insights computing contingent wisdom mapping the future formulating predictive forecasts aggregating definitive contingencies delivering critical forecasts crowdsourcing definitive insights aggregating precise estimations modeling intelligent futures computing critical futures assembling critical estimations

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

When will the first 49+ qubit universal quantum computer be constructed?

Quantum computation is a steadily-improving technology with vast promise that is arguably poised to take off in the next decade or two and potentially revolutionize a number of fields.

Quantum computers exploit quantum effects of entanglement and superposition in systems acting as "qubits" (quantum bits) to efficiently perform calculations that are inefficient using classical computers. Most famous is the ability to factor very large numbers, the difficulty of which underlies many current cryptography systems. But there is much more: quantum computers could, for example, efficiently simulate quantum systems in chemistry and biology, leading to dramatically more powerful tools for designing materials, drugs, etc.

The basic theory behind quantum computers is well understood, and computers with a handful of qubits have been created as of 2016. It is generally (though not universally) believed that only technological barriers exist to creating large-scale quantum computers.

An interesting threshold is 50 qubits, at which quantum computers could outpace contemporary supercomputers in at least some applications. Google has recently stated a goal of a 49 (7x7 array) qubit device in 2018, and IBM has announced a similar goal.

These goals may be "ambitious" but suggest that we may be years, rather than decades, away from general-purpose quantum computers. We ask:

When will the first general-purpose quantum computer with > 48 qubits be constructed and operated to solve a computational problem?

Resolution will occur via credible media or company report. Non-universal quantum computing systems (such as D-Wave's device) do not satisfy the criteria. The problem (e.g. prime factorization) need not be solved faster than any given classical computer, but must use the full 49+ qubit apparatus and be arguably nontrivial, e.g. use an algorithm that was developed specifically for quantum computation.

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.