modeling definitive predictions crowdsourcing intelligent estimations modeling calibrated predictions calculating accurate futures mapping intelligent wisdom mapping the future forecasting precise forecasts aggregating accurate predictions composing contingent futures predicting quantitative futures aggregating contingent estimations modeling intelligent contingencies generating quantitative insights forecasting contingent predictions


Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

How much impact of quantum experiment exhibiting "exotic looped trajectories" of light?

The double-slit experiment is one of the fundamental demonstrations of quantum properties of photons: a light beam passing through two parallel slits creates an interference pattern on the other side, indicating the wave-like properties of light. But certain aspects of the experiment indicate particle-like properties as well, suggesting the particle-wave duality that is one of the hallmarks of quantum mechanics.

A recent experiment adds a new wrinkle to the classic double-slit experiment. Results of a three-slit experiment suggest that photons may follow "exotic looped trajectories" in their path from source to target, weaving between the slits in a most un-lightlike way. Unpublished work on arXiv suggests that the researchers also expect to find these looped trajectories in double-slit experiments as well.

Although the paper has tens of thousands of page views and nearly 10,000 mentions on Twitter, a more direct measure of the work's acceptance in the scientific community is its number of citations by other papers exploring the same or similar phenomenon. As of mid-June 2017, a Google Scholar search shows 4 citations.

How many times will the paper paper describing this experiment be cited by the end of 2017?

This question will resolve on January 1 2018, with the definitive number of citations determined by a Google Scholar search.


Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.