computing definitive wisdom formulating calibrated forecasts forecasting precise understanding computing definitive understanding formulating accurate forecasts mapping the future aggregating predictive predictions forecasting contingent understanding mapping definitive forecasts forecasting precise predictions aggregating definitive contingencies forecasting accurate predictions assembling precise understanding assembling calibrated predictions

Question

Metaculus Help: Spread the word

If you like Metaculus, tell your friends! Share this question via Facebook, Twitter, or Reddit.

Will the WHO classify aging as a disease by 2018?

Scientists are beginning to target aging itself as a pathology, viewing it as a root cause to many age-related problems like diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and Alzheimer's. The World Health Organization (WHO) is being pushed by many drug developers to classify aging as a disease, which would allow pharmaceuticals to produce commercialized medication that specifically targets the process, and in turn treating all the pathology, of aging.

A change like this would take place in the final release of ICD-11 (International Classification of Diseases, 11th revision), which will be released by WHO by 2018. The change in classification would have an imact in aging research and drugs that are currently in trial or under review, allowing for a non-ambiguous approach to treating aging itself as a condition. For example, the drug Metformin, whose marketed intent is to treat type II diabetes but shown to increase longevity in animal studies, would gain traction with the FDA to officially classify it as an aging treatment.

Will WHO recognize ageing as a disease in ICD-11?

This question resolves in the affirmative if the ICD-11 carries a health code for the biological process of ageing or senescence by December 31, 2018.

{{qctrl.predictionString()}}

Metaculus help: Predicting

Predictions are the heart of Metaculus. Predicting is how you contribute to the wisdom of the crowd, and how you earn points and build up your personal Metaculus track record.

The basics of predicting are very simple: move the slider to best match the likelihood of the outcome, and click predict. You can predict as often as you want, and you're encouraged to change your mind when new information becomes available. With tachyons you'll even be able to go back in time and backdate your prediction to maximize your points.

The displayed score is split into current points and total points. Current points show how much your prediction is worth now, whereas total points show the combined worth of all of your predictions over the lifetime of the question. The scoring details are available on the FAQ.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. All of your predictions came after the resolution, so you did not gain (or lose) any points for it.

Note: this question resolved before its original close time. You earned points up until the question resolution, but not afterwards.

This question is not yet open for predictions.

Thanks for predicting!

Your prediction has been recorded anonymously.

Want to track your predictions, earn points, and hone your forecasting skills? Create an account today!

Track your predictions
Continue exploring the site

Community Stats

Metaculus help: Community Stats

Use the community stats to get a better sense of the community consensus (or lack thereof) for this question. Sometimes people have wildly different ideas about the likely outcomes, and sometimes people are in close agreement. There are even times when the community seems very certain of uncertainty, like when everyone agrees that event is only 50% likely to happen.

When you make a prediction, check the community stats to see where you land. If your prediction is an outlier, might there be something you're overlooking that others have seen? Or do you have special insight that others are lacking? Either way, it might be a good idea to join the discussion in the comments.