M

Contests

This page shows the obsolete contests. They were superseded in April 2021 by Tournaments.

Contest Start End Questions
Forecasting AI Progress — Bayes Prize Leaderboard Dec 13, 2020 Apr 16, 2021 81
Consensus Forecasting . . .
Li Wenliang Forecasting Tournament I Feb 17, 2020 Jun 17, 2020 52
Li Wenliang Tournament 2 . . .
Covid-19 Tournament Round 2 . . .
Cryptocurrency Prediction Contest Sep 14, 2017 Dec 1, 2017 24
Forecasting AI Progress — Deep Learning Round Feb 13, 2021 Apr 16, 2021 30
El Paso Series . . .
COVID-19 Lightning Round Tournament [first tournament] . . .
COVID-19 Lightning Round Tournament [second tournament] . . .
Foresight 2020 contest Oct 14, 2019 Oct 31, 2020 13
Forecasting AI Progress — Hill Climbing Round Jan 13, 2021 Mar 15, 2021 29
Lockdown Tournament . . .
Forecasting AI Progress — Maximum Likelihood Round Dec 9, 2020 Jun 15, 2021 29
Road to recovery Oct 1, 2020 Feb 28, 2021 16
Salk Tournament . . .

Metaculus is excited to once again be partnering with Professor Thomas McAndrew and the Computational Uncertainty Lab at Lehigh University, with grant support from MIDAS (Modeling of Infectious Disease Agent Study) to generate actionable consensus forecasts on COVID-19 in the U.S. Your participation is greatly appreciated — it is always great to be able to harness our forecasting prowess in service of the greater good!

The goal of this project is to provide probabilistic predictions of the U.S. COVID-19 outbreak to support public health decision making at the federal and state level.

Predictions you make will be aggregated into a consensus forecast: an aggregate of individualized human predictions---and a subset of questions will be used to build a metaforecast: a combination of predictions from computational models and humans.

We plan to ask between 4 and 8 questions related to public health targets each month. This will take place on a monthly basis from this month through June 2021.

Questions will be posted at least 24 hours before they are officially opened for forecasting. During this time, we encourage forecasters to review the questions and ask for clarifications if needed by using the comment box on the Metaculus platform to ask questions under the corresponding question.

After the 24 hour review period, questions will be opened for forecasting. As usual, you will have the opportunity to review/revise your probabilistic predictions as many times as desired up until 10 days after questions are opened for forecasting.

We feel an important component to predictions based on human judgment is our ability as humans to provide a rationale alongside a quantitative forecast. We strongly encourage you to provide a rationale behind your forecast and/or supportive information to (i) help fellow forecasters and (ii) provide insight into how you made your prediction.

At the end of each month we will share a summary report with the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, all members of MIDAS (Modeling of Infectious Disease Agent Study), and make this report available for public consumption. The summary report will include: (i) a synopsis of consensus predictions, (ii) a line list of each question and the consensus prediction, (iii) plots of the consensus probabilistic predictions for each question, (iv) methodology for how predictions are combined, and (v) a detailed list of each question, the background text, and resolution criteria.

Each question has a resolution criteria---the method we will use to determine the ground truth. Before a question is resolved, forecasters can view their individual probabilistic prediction overlaid against the consensus prediction. After a question is resolved, you will receive points that are based on your absolute performance and your performance relative to other forecasters. Details on scoring can be found in the Metaculus FAQ (https://www.metaculus.com/help/faq/#howscore) and the Metaculus scoring system page (https://www.metaculus.com/help/scoring/). In addition, when a question is resolved you receive a personal email that details the ground truth, your prediction, the points you were awarded.

Forecasters can see their performance across all questions that have resolved on their profile page — here, they will be able to access their Brier and Log scores averaged over all questions.

A document that outlines data security, privacy, and study procedures can be found here.

If you have any questions about the study, please email Tom McAndrew directly (mcandrew[at]lehigh[dot]edu).

Acknowledgment of Support: This research is supported through the MIDAS Coordination Center (MIDASNI2020-1) by a grant from the National Institute of General Medical Science (3U24GM132013-02S2).

Rank Player Points Questions
1 datscilly 1325 43
2 Cory 1263 43
3 Vang 1249 45
4 PepeS 1198 44
5 SimonM 1076 45
6 elifland 856 37
7 Zweihander 645 45
8 TeeJayKay 626 24
9 galen 610 34
10 Pablo 605 22
11 2e10e122 600 35
12 Bob_Jacobs 555 35
13 MaciekK 532 21
14 Reprisal 498 25
15 ItsRyan 488 15
16 Alexander230 395 24
17 Jotto 358 23
18 lars3loff 335 18
19 JAJMLP 333 31
20 JonathanShi 309 20
21 chipsie 300 10
22 joshyou 292 9
23 Jgalt 289 19
24 taskaryan 255 10
25 dosthus 244 19
26 nostramus 236 14
27 Jrob6122 199 14
28 mattvdm 191 13
29 Sergio 186 7
30 jack 179 11
31 benz 144 1
32 schelling42 142 2
33 Takeshi 137 8
34 ScottLeibrand 128 3
35 schkolne 122 10
36 sergeant1337 121 2
37 yobi 117 3
38 halvorz 109 4
39 James 108 4
40 nextbigfuture 101 11
41 ClayGraubard 98 7
42 AloanCloud 90 4
43 EvanHarper 80 13
44 JasperGötting 80 6
45 beala 79 3
46 prowler 78 1
47 alexlitz 78 9
48 JamesEvans 76 1
49 bryanleroylewis 74 6
50 pg3516 69 1
51 brp 68 5
52 TheObsoleteMan 68 3
53 foo 65 10
54 SamtheSamurai 64 1
55 minnow_beacon 60 2
56 Mohican 59 1
57 jgil 59 7
58 tsmilton 57 1
59 isaacdunn 55 9
60 jjbalisanyukasmith 55 1
61 eidanjacob 55 9
62 BrentR 54 3
63 redcell254 53 1
64 sriniv.venkat 50 15
65 jgoss1074 47 1
66 koe 46 1
67 ManyEyed 45 1
68 arun2642 44 4
69 kermit17 42 1
70 StevenG 41 1
71 PeterWildeford 40 18
72 zenblews 39 1
73 nickkees 37 7
74 citizen 36 16
75 gph 36 1
76 nathan.j.mcdougall 34 1
77 TrevorH 34 1
78 ege_erdil 34 1
79 Charles 30 1
80 MJ 29 1
81 matei.ionita 27 1
82 JohnBeshir 26 2
83 Physburgh 25 1
84 wleightond 25 2
85 jacobgerlach 24 1
86 jimmy.p.watts 24 1
87 M4 23 1
88 ChALkeR 23 3
89 Shiremonkey 23 1
90 dyoshida 22 1
91 Caelestis 22 5
92 isaacbg227 21 2
93 meril 20 1
94 isinlor 19 3
95 oakley.wall 19 1
96 jox 18 1
97 wobblybobby 16 1
98 Brick.Tamland 14 4
99 samuelraasch 14 1
100 ctlcactuS 13 1